The Code of Silence in Schools: An Assessment of a Socio-ecological Model of Youth's Willingness to Report School Misbehavior (2024)

Abstract

Socio-ecological models of victimization reporting incorporate normative constraints and instrumental considerations at the individual and contextual levels. Drawing on this model, we explore factors related to students’ willingness to report problem behaviors that they might observe in school. Data obtained from student and teacher/administrator surveys and administrative data are used to explore these relationships. We find that individual-level factors are the primary determinants of reporting attitudes, but school context is also important. Students are more willing to report misbehavior in schools with democratic authority structures and consistent enforcement of school rules. Attitudes toward reporting are less favorable when the school culture is supportive of a street code, and the effect of street code culture is fully explained by students’ personal norms and experiences. We also find evidence that personal adherence to a street code moderates the effect of school context on reporting attitudes. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.

Original languageAmerican English
Journal
Volume49
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 3 2017

Disciplines

  • Criminology and Criminal Justice
  • Psychology
  • Curriculum and Instruction

Cite this

  • APA
  • Standard
  • Harvard
  • Vancouver
  • Author
  • BIBTEX
  • RIS

Slocum, L., Esbensen, F.-A., & Taylor, T. J. (2017). The Code of Silence in Schools: An Assessment of a Socio-ecological Model of Youth's Willingness to Report School Misbehavior. , 49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X14528958

The Code of Silence in Schools: An Assessment of a Socio-ecological Model of Youth's Willingness to Report School Misbehavior. / Slocum, Lee; Esbensen, Finn-Aage; Taylor, Terrance J.
In: , Vol. 49, 03.01.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Slocum, L, Esbensen, F-A & Taylor, TJ 2017, 'The Code of Silence in Schools: An Assessment of a Socio-ecological Model of Youth's Willingness to Report School Misbehavior', , vol. 49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X14528958

Slocum L, Esbensen FA, Taylor TJ. The Code of Silence in Schools: An Assessment of a Socio-ecological Model of Youth's Willingness to Report School Misbehavior. . 2017 Jan 3;49. doi: 10.1177/0044118X14528958

Slocum, Lee ; Esbensen, Finn-Aage ; Taylor, Terrance J. / The Code of Silence in Schools: An Assessment of a Socio-ecological Model of Youth's Willingness to Report School Misbehavior. In: . 2017 ; Vol. 49.

@article{9b33100fcb97490796368c133dd889be,

title = "The Code of Silence in Schools: An Assessment of a Socio-ecological Model of Youth's Willingness to Report School Misbehavior",

abstract = " Socio-ecological models of victimization reporting incorporate normative constraints and instrumental considerations at the individual and contextual levels. Drawing on this model, we explore factors related to students{\textquoteright} willingness to report problem behaviors that they might observe in school. Data obtained from student and teacher/administrator surveys and administrative data are used to explore these relationships. We find that individual-level factors are the primary determinants of reporting attitudes, but school context is also important. Students are more willing to report misbehavior in schools with democratic authority structures and consistent enforcement of school rules. Attitudes toward reporting are less favorable when the school culture is supportive of a street code, and the effect of street code culture is fully explained by students{\textquoteright} personal norms and experiences. We also find evidence that personal adherence to a street code moderates the effect of school context on reporting attitudes. Implications for theory and practice are discussed. ",

author = "Lee Slocum and Finn-Aage Esbensen and Taylor, {Terrance J.}",

note = "Socio-ecological models of victimization reporting incorporate normative constraints and instrumental considerations at the individual and contextual levels. Drawing on this model, we explore factors related to students' willingness to report problem behaviors that they might observe in school. Data obtained from student and teacher/administrator surveys and administrative data are used to explore these relationships.",

year = "2017",

month = jan,

day = "3",

doi = "10.1177/0044118X14528958",

language = "American English",

volume = "49",

journal = "Youth & Society",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Code of Silence in Schools: An Assessment of a Socio-ecological Model of Youth's Willingness to Report School Misbehavior

AU - Slocum, Lee

AU - Esbensen, Finn-Aage

AU - Taylor, Terrance J.

N1 - Socio-ecological models of victimization reporting incorporate normative constraints and instrumental considerations at the individual and contextual levels. Drawing on this model, we explore factors related to students' willingness to report problem behaviors that they might observe in school. Data obtained from student and teacher/administrator surveys and administrative data are used to explore these relationships.

PY - 2017/1/3

Y1 - 2017/1/3

N2 - Socio-ecological models of victimization reporting incorporate normative constraints and instrumental considerations at the individual and contextual levels. Drawing on this model, we explore factors related to students’ willingness to report problem behaviors that they might observe in school. Data obtained from student and teacher/administrator surveys and administrative data are used to explore these relationships. We find that individual-level factors are the primary determinants of reporting attitudes, but school context is also important. Students are more willing to report misbehavior in schools with democratic authority structures and consistent enforcement of school rules. Attitudes toward reporting are less favorable when the school culture is supportive of a street code, and the effect of street code culture is fully explained by students’ personal norms and experiences. We also find evidence that personal adherence to a street code moderates the effect of school context on reporting attitudes. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.

AB - Socio-ecological models of victimization reporting incorporate normative constraints and instrumental considerations at the individual and contextual levels. Drawing on this model, we explore factors related to students’ willingness to report problem behaviors that they might observe in school. Data obtained from student and teacher/administrator surveys and administrative data are used to explore these relationships. We find that individual-level factors are the primary determinants of reporting attitudes, but school context is also important. Students are more willing to report misbehavior in schools with democratic authority structures and consistent enforcement of school rules. Attitudes toward reporting are less favorable when the school culture is supportive of a street code, and the effect of street code culture is fully explained by students’ personal norms and experiences. We also find evidence that personal adherence to a street code moderates the effect of school context on reporting attitudes. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.

UR - http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0044118X14528958

UR - http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0044118X14528958

U2 - 10.1177/0044118X14528958

DO - 10.1177/0044118X14528958

M3 - Article

VL - 49

JO - Youth & Society

JF - Youth & Society

ER -

The Code of Silence in Schools: An Assessment of a Socio-ecological Model of Youth's Willingness to Report School Misbehavior (2024)

FAQs

What is the socio ecological model of education? ›

The social ecological model illustrates the importance of networks of people and structures that surround a child or adolescent, safeguarding their well-being and sense of agency, and supporting their optimal development.

What is the ecological model of the classroom? ›

In the ecological approach, there are three major elements for classroom management that need to be addressed. These are classroom design, teaching strategies, and behavioral prevention measures. Together, these three things cover all the elements of a child's learning environment.

What is the 5 socio-ecological model? ›

The framework typically includes 5 levels of influence: (1) intrapersonal (eg, individual, athlete), (2) interpersonal (eg, athletic trainer [AT], coach, parent, athletic director), (3) organizational (eg, community, school), (4) environmental (eg, cultural norms, physical environment), and (5) policy (eg, state high ...

What are the 5 spheres of the socio-ecological model? ›

This figure illustrates one example of the Social-Ecological Model, which includes five levels: the individual/intrapersonal sphere, the interpersonal sphere, the organizational/institutional sphere, the community sphere, and the policy sphere (McLeroy, Bibeau, Steckler, & Glanz, 1988).

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Recommended Articles
Article information

Author: Msgr. Refugio Daniel

Last Updated:

Views: 6410

Rating: 4.3 / 5 (54 voted)

Reviews: 85% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Msgr. Refugio Daniel

Birthday: 1999-09-15

Address: 8416 Beatty Center, Derekfort, VA 72092-0500

Phone: +6838967160603

Job: Mining Executive

Hobby: Woodworking, Knitting, Fishing, Coffee roasting, Kayaking, Horseback riding, Kite flying

Introduction: My name is Msgr. Refugio Daniel, I am a fine, precious, encouraging, calm, glamorous, vivacious, friendly person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.